####### Video #######
A man unknowingly carrying a rare cancer-linked gene mutation donated sperm that ended up fathering 67 children across various families.

It has now come to light that 10 of those children have developed cancer, while another 20 have been found to carry the same harmful gene variant.

The case came to public attention after two separate families contacted fertility clinics to report that their children had developed cancers tied to a rare genetic mutation known as TP53.

According to Medline Plus, this specific gene variant is responsible for a condition known as Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), which significantly increases the risk of developing several types of cancer, including leukemia.

Medical professionals recommend that individuals with this gene receive lifelong screenings, such as full-body and brain MRIs, to catch any signs of cancer early.

But this mutation wasn’t well-known when the donor gave his sperm, with most of his donations taking place back in 2008 before such guidelines were widespread.

This incident has resulted in questioning around the number of allowed donationsGetty Stock Image
According to a report by The Guardian, the man was believed to be in good health at the time of his donations.

Dr. Edwige Kasper, a biologist working at Rouen University Hospital in France, explained the genetic findings by saying: “I analysed the variant using population and patient databases, computer prediction tools and the results of functional trials and came to the conclusion that the variant was probably cancer-causing and that children born from this donor should receive genetic counselling.”

Currently, there is no globally enforced cap on the number of children that can be born from a single donor. However, The European Sperm Bank, where the man donated, enforces an internal limit of 75 children per donor.

In this particular case, the bank confirmed that more than 67 children had been conceived using the donor’s sperm, though they declined to give the exact total.

They also confirmed that the clinics involved had been notified about the situation.

Many of the births happened between 2008 and 2015. The incident has since triggered fresh discussions around whether there should be stricter international rules governing sperm donation.

The man was unaware that he carried a cancer-causing geneGetty Stock Image

Dr. Kasper stressed that urgent reforms are needed to avoid similar tragedies in the future. She said: “We need to have a European limit on the number of births or families for a single donor.”

“We can’t do whole-genome sequencing for all sperm donors – I’m not arguing for that. But this is the abnormal dissemination of genetic disease. Not every man has 75 children across Europe.”

Nicky Hudson, a professor at De Montfort University in Leicester, also emphasized the potential dangers of transporting donor sperm across different countries without proper regulation or limits.

Hudson explained further: “The important issues at stake here relate to the large number of affected children – which would be limited if only used within one country according to local limits – and the challenge of tracing the families, who can now span multiple countries.”

“Whilst these kinds of cases have thankfully been rare, we need to consider ways to limit the possibility of this scenario becoming more frequent in future by coordinating international practice. At the very least we need better systems for tracking donor usage and of informing recipients of this.”

At least 67 children were conceived with this man’s spermGetty stock images

Speaking to The Guardian, a representative from The European Sperm Bank said they were deeply saddened by the outcome and reiterated that the donor had undergone extensive screening. However, they admitted that, “it is scientifically simply not possible to detect disease-causing mutations in a person’s gene pool if you don’t know what you are looking for.”

The spokesperson continued: “We welcome continued dialogue on setting an internationally mandated family limit and have advocated for this on several occasions. This is also why we have proactively implemented our own international limit of 75 families per donor.”

####### Rewarded #######

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *